Esophageal Symptoms and Lumbosacral Back Pain.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Esophageal symptoms, that is, heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, and chest pain are common in the general population. Also common are symptoms of back pain related to pathology in the lumbosacral spine. The right crus of the diaphragm that forms the esophageal hiatus, originates from lumbar spine, may be affected by lumbar spine pathology resulting in esophageal symptoms. We studied whether there was an association between esophageal symptoms and spine symptoms. METHODS: Two patient groups of 150 each were investigated: group 1 (ES); patients referred to the esophageal manometry study for assessment of esophageal symptoms, group 2 (SC); patients undergoing screening colonoscopy (control group). Both groups completed standardized questionnaires assessing esophageal and spine symptoms. RESULTS: Back pain was reported by 74% of patients in the ES group as compared to 55% of patients in the SC group. Thirty percent of patients in the SC group reported one or more esophageal symptoms and these patients were regrouped with the ES group, resulting in 2 groups, ES1 and SC1, with and without esophageal symptoms, respectively. The ES1 group was 3.3 times more likely to experience back pain compared to the SC1 group (95% confidence interval: 1.95-5.46). Thoracolumbar was the most common site of pain in both groups. Pain score was greater for the group with esophageal symptoms compared to controls. Narcotic intake for most patients in the ES1 group was for back pain. CONCLUSION: A strong association between esophageal symptoms and thoracolumbar back pain raises the possibility that structural and functional changes in the esophageal hiatus muscles related to thoracolumbar spine pathology lead to esophageal dysmotility and symptoms.

Why so Many Patients With Dysphagia Have Normal Esophageal Function Testing.

Esophageal peristalsis involves a sequential process of initial inhibition (relaxation) and excitation (contraction), both occurring from the cranial to caudal direction. The bolus induces luminal distension during initial inhibition (receptive relaxation) that facilitates smooth propulsion by contraction travelling behind the bolus. Luminal distension during peristalsis in normal subjects exhibits unique characteristics that are influenced by bolus volume, bolus viscosity, and posture, suggesting a potential interaction between distension and contraction. Examining distension-contraction plots in dysphagia patients with normal bolus clearance, ie, high-amplitude esophageal peristaltic contractions, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, and functional dysphagia, reveal 2 important findings. Firstly, patients with type 3 achalasia and nonobstructive dysphagia show luminal occlusion distal to the bolus during peristalsis. Secondly, patients with high-amplitude esophageal peristaltic contractions, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, and functional dysphagia exhibit a narrow esophageal lumen through which the bolus travels during peristalsis. These findings indicate a relative dynamic obstruction to bolus flow and reduced distensibility of the esophageal wall in patients with several primary esophageal motility disorders. We speculate that the dysphagia sensation experienced by many patients may result from a normal or supernormal contraction wave pushing the bolus against resistance. Integrating representations of distension and contraction, along with objective assessments of flow timing and distensibility, complements the current classification of esophageal motility disorders that are based on the contraction characteristics only. A deeper understanding of the distensibility of the bolus-containing esophageal segment during peristalsis holds promise for the development of innovative medical and surgical therapies to effectively address dysphagia in a substantial number of patients.

Selective dysfunction of the crural diaphragm in patients with chronic restrictive and obstructive lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is known to be associated with chronic lung diseases. The driving force of GER is the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) generated mainly by costal and crural diaphragm contraction. The latter also enhances the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure to guard against GER. METHODS: The relationship between Pdi and EGJ pressure was determined using high resolution esophageal manometry in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD, n = 26), obstructive lung disease (OLD, n- = 24), and healthy subjects (n = 20). KEY RESULTS: The patient groups did not differ with respect to age, gender, BMI, and pulmonary rehabilitation history. Patients with ILD had significantly higher Pdi but lower EGJ pressures as compared to controls and OLD patients (p < 0.001). In control subjects, the increase in EGJ pressure at all-time points during inspiration was greater than Pdi. In contrast, the EGJ pressure during inspiration was less than Pdi in 14 patients with ILD and 7 patients with OLD. The drop in EGJ pressure was usually seen after the peak Pdi in ILD group (p < 0.0001) and before the peak Pdi in OLD group, (p = 0.08). Nine patients in the ILD group had sliding hiatus hernia, compared to none in control subjects (p = 0.003) and two patients in the OLD, (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: A higher Pdi and low EGJ pressure, and dissociation between Pdi and EGJ pressure temporal relationship suggests selective dysfunction of the crural diaphragm in patients with chronic lung diseases and may explain the higher prevalence of GERD in ILD as seen in previous studies.

Impaired sliding between the lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm (esophageal hiatus) in patients with achalasia esophagus.

Swallow-related axial shortening of the esophagus results in the formation of phrenic ampulla in normal subjects; whether it is the case in achalasia esophagus is not known. The goal is to study axial shortening of the esophagus and relative movement between the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and crural diaphragm (CD) in normal subjects and patients with achalasia. A novel method, isoimpedance contour excursion at the lower edger of LES, as a marker of axial esophageal shortening was validated using X-ray fluoroscopy (n = 5) and used to study axial shortening and separation between the LES and CD during peristalsis in normal subjects (n = 15) and patients with achalasia type 2 esophagus (n = 15). Abdominal CT scan images were used to determine the nature of tissue in the esophageal hiatus of control (n = 15) and achalasia patients (n = 15). Swallow-induced peristalsis resulted in an axial excursion of isoimpedance contours, which was quantitatively similar to the metal clip anchored to the LES on X-ray fluoroscopy (2.3 ± 1.4 vs. 2.1 ± 1.4 cm with deep inspiration and 2.7 ± 0.6 cm vs. 2.7 ± 0.6 cm with swallow-induced peristalsis). Esophageal axial shortening with swallows in patients with achalasia was significantly smaller than normal (1.64 ± 0.5 cm vs. 3.59 ± 0.4 cm, P < 0.001). Gray-level matrix analysis of CT images suggests more "fibrous" and less fat in the hiatus of patients with achalasia. Lack of sliding between the LES and CD explains the low prevalence of hiatus hernia, and low compliance of the LES in achalasia esophagus, which likely plays a role in the pathogenesis of achalasia.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Swallow-related axial shortening of the esophagus is reduced, and there is no separation between the lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm (CD) with swallowing in patients with achalasia esophagus. Fat in the hiatal opening of the esophagus appears to be replaced with fibrous tissue in patients with achalasia, resulting in tight anchoring between the LES and CD. The above findings explain low prevalence of hiatus hernia and the low compliance of the LES in achalasia esophagus.

Esophageal wall compliance/stiffness during peristalsis in patients with functional dysphagia and high-amplitude esophageal contractions.

Recent studies that utilized distension/contraction plots to study peristalsis reveal poor distension of the esophagus in patients with functional dysphagia and high-amplitude contractions [high-amplitude esophageal contractions (HAECs)] even though the contraction phase of peristalsis is normal in these patients. Our goal was to determine biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall and bolus flow characteristics in patients with functional dysphagia and HAEC during primary peristalsis. Studies were performed on 30 healthy subjects, 30 patients with functional dysphagia, and 25 patients with HAEC. Subjects swallowed 10 mL, 0.5 N saline bolus in the Trendelenburg position to study primary peristalsis. A custom-built software (Dplots) determined peak distension from the impedance measurements, pressure at peak distension, wall tension (pressure × radius), wall distensibility [cross-sectional area (CSA)/pressure], and bolus flow (cm3/s) in four segments of esophagus (between upper and lower esophageal sphincter). Luminal CSA of distal esophagus was smaller, and average bolus flow rate was faster in patients with functional dysphagia and HAEC. Esophageal wall distensibility, a measure of esophageal wall compliance was lower and wall tension was higher in the distal esophagus of both patient groups compared with normal subjects. Ultrasound imaging confirmed poor distension of the esophagus. A trend toward greater wall thickness at the peak of distension was found in patients with functional dysphagia compared with normal subjects. A stiffer or noncompliant esophageal wall is the reason for poor distension of the esophagus during primary peristalsis in patients with functional dysphagia and HAEC.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We studied healthy asymptomatic subject, patients with functional dysphagia (FD), and patients with high-amplitude esophageal contractions (HAEC). Our data show that in patients with HAEC and functional dysphagia, luminal distension is smaller (low luminal CSA at peak distension), intraluminal pressure is higher, and liquid bolus travels faster through the esophagus as compared with normal subjects. We conclude that patients with functional dysphagia and HAEC have a stiffer distal esophageal wall during bolus transport related to primary peristalsis.

Distension contraction plots of pharyngeal/esophageal peristalsis: next frontier in the assessment of esophageal motor function.

Esophageal peristalsis consists of initial inhibition (relaxation) followed by excitation (contraction), both of which move sequentially in the aboral direction. Initial inhibition results in receptive relaxation and bolus-induced luminal distension, which allows propulsion by the contraction with minimal resistance to flow. Similar to the contraction wave, luminal distension has unique waveform characteristics in normal subjects; both are modulated by bolus volume, bolus viscosity, and posture, suggesting a possible cause-and-effect relationship between the two. Distension contraction plots in patients with dysphagia with normal bolus clearance [high-amplitude esophageal contractions (HAECs), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), and functional dysphagia (FD)] reveal two major findings: 1) unlike normal subjects, there is luminal occlusion distal to bolus during peristalsis in certain patients, i.e., with type 3 achalasia and nonobstructive dysphagia; and 2) bolus travels through a narrow lumen esophagus during peristalsis in patients with HAECs, EGJOO, and FD. Aforementioned findings indicate a relative dynamic obstruction to the bolus flow during peristalsis and reduced distensibility of esophageal wall in the bolus segment of the esophagus. We speculate that a normal or supernormal contraction wave pushing bolus against resistance is the mechanism of dysphagia sensation in significant number of patients. Representations of distension and contraction, combined with objective measures of flow timing and distensibility are complementary to the current scheme of classifying esophageal motility disorders based solely on the characteristics of contraction phase of peristalsis. Better understanding of the distensibility of the bolus-containing segment of the esophagus during peristalsis will lead to the development of novel medical and surgical therapies in the treatment of dysphagia in significant number of patients.

Rhythmic contraction but arrhythmic distension of esophageal peristaltic reflex in patients with dysphagia.

BACKGROUND: Reason for dysphagia in a significant number of patients remains unclear even after a thorough workup. Each swallow induces esophageal distension followed by contraction of the esophagus, both of which move sequentially along the esophagus. Manometry technique and current system of classifying esophageal motility disorders (Chicago Classification) is based on the analysis of the contraction phase of peristalsis. GOAL: Whether patients with unexplained dysphagia have abnormalities in the distension phase of esophageal peristalsis is not known. METHODS: Using Multiple Intraluminal esophageal impedance recordings, which allow determination of the luminal cross-sectional area during peristalsis, we studied patients with nutcracker esophagus (NC), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), and functional dysphagia (FD). RESULTS: Distension contraction plots revealed that swallowed bolus travels significantly faster through the esophagus in all patient groups as compared to normals. The luminal cross-sectional area (amplitude of distension), and the area under the curve of distension were significantly smaller in patients with NC, EGJOO, and FD as compared to normals. Bolus traverses the esophagus in the shape of an "American Football" in normal subjects. On the other hand, in patients the bolus flow was fragmented. ROC curves revealed that bolus flow abnormalities during peristalsis are a sensitive and specific marker of dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal abnormality in the distension phase of peristalsis (a narrow lumen esophagus) in patients with dysphagia. We propose that the esophageal contraction forcing the swallowed bolus through a narrow lumen esophagus is the cause of dysphagia sensation in patients with normal contraction phase of peristalsis.

Do resistance exercises during biofeedback therapy enhance the anal sphincter and pelvic floor muscles in anal incontinence?

AIM: To determine if a biofeedback therapy that includes concentric resistance exercise for the anal sphincter muscles can improve muscle strength/function and improve AI symptoms compared to the traditional/non-resistance biofeedback therapy. BACKGROUND: Biofeedback therapy is the current gold standard treatment for patients with anal incontinence (AI). Lack of resistance exercise biofeedback programs is a limitation in current practice. METHODS: Thirty-three women with AI (mean age 60 years) were randomly assigned to concentric (resistance) or isometric (non-resistance) biofeedback training. Concentric training utilized the Functional Luminal Imaging Probe to provide progressive resistance exercises based on the patient's ability to collapse the anal canal lumen. Isometric training utilized a non-collapsible 10 mm diameter probe. Both groups performed a biofeedback protocol once per week in the clinic for 12 weeks and at home daily. High definition anal manometry was used to assess anal sphincter strength; symptoms were measured using FISI and UDI-6. 3D transperineal ultrasound imaging was used to assess the anal sphincter muscle integrity. RESULTS: Concentric and isometric groups improved FISI and UDI-6 scores to a similar degree. Both the concentric and isometric groups showed small improvement in the anal high-pressure zone; however, there was no difference between the two groups. Ultrasound image analysis revealed significant damage to the anal sphincter muscles in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Concentric resistance biofeedback training did not improve the anal sphincter muscle function or AI symptoms beyond traditional biofeedback training. Anal sphincter muscle damage may be an important factor that limits the success of biofeedback training.

Bolus flow and biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall during primary esophageal peristalsis: Effects of bolus viscosity and posture.

BACKGROUND: Studies show that intraluminal impedance recordings of the esophagus allow one to measure the luminal distension during peristalsis, an important parameter for calculation of the biomechanical properties of esophageal wall. The goal was to determine the effect of subject posture and bolus viscosity on the biomechanical properties of esophageal wall, and the rate of bolus flow along the length of the esophagus during primary peristalsis. METHODS: High-resolution manometry impedance recordings were obtained in 14 normal healthy subjects. Swallows of 10 ml saline and viscous bolus were recorded in the supine and Trendelenburg positions. User identified the region of interest, and a custom-designed software extracted parameters of interest such as bolus flow rate, esophageal wall tension, and esophageal wall distensibility in four equal segments of the esophagus. KEY RESULTS: Bolus flow rate decreases along the length of the esophagus, being slowest in the distal esophagus. Bolus flow rate is smaller in the Trendelenburg position and with viscous bolus as compared with supine position and saline bolus. Esophageal wall tension is greater in the Trendelenburg position and with viscous bolus as compared with the supine position and saline bolus. The esophageal wall distensibility is larger in the distal as compared with proximal esophagus, which is true for both the saline and viscous bolus. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: We report, for the first time, bolus flow rate and biomechanical properties of the esophageal wall during swallow-induced primary peristalsis. Future studies may investigate biomechanical basis of esophageal motility disorders using the methodology described.

Distension-contraction profile of peristalsis in patients with nutcracker esophagus.

INTRODUCTION: High amplitude peristaltic esophageal contractions, that is, nutcracker esophagus, were originally described in association with "angina-like pain" of esophageal origin. However, significant number of nutcracker patients also suffer from dysphagia. High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) assesses only the contraction phase of peristalsis. The degree of esophageal distension during peristalsis is a surrogate of relaxation and can be measured from the intraluminal esophageal impedance measurements. AIMS: Determine the amplitude of distension and temporal relationship between distension and contraction during swallow-induced peristalsis in nutcracker patients. METHODS: HRM impedance (HRMZ) studies were performed and analyzed in 24 nutcracker and 30 normal subjects in the Trendelenburg position. A custom-built software calculated the numerical data of the amplitudes of distension and contraction, the area under the curve (AUC) of distension and contraction, and the temporal relationship between distension and contraction. RESULTS: In normal subjects, the distension peaks similar to contraction traverse sequentially the esophagus. The amplitude of contraction is greater in the nutcracker esophagus but the amplitude of distension and area under the curve of distension are smaller in patients compared to controls. Distension peaks are aligned closely with contraction in normal subjects, but in patients, the bolus travels faster to the distal esophagus, resulting in a smaller time interval between the onset of swallow and distension peak. Receiver operative characteristics (ROC) curve reveals high sensitivity and specificity of the above parameters in patients. CONCLUSION: Abnormalities in the distension phase of peristalsis are a possible mechanism of dysphagia in patients with nutcracker esophagus.

Novel gel bolus to improve impedance-based measurements of esophageal cross-sectional area during primary peristalsis.

INTRODUCTION: Intraluminal esophageal impedance (ILEE) has the potential to measure esophageal luminal distension during swallow-induced peristalsis in the esophagus. A potential cause of inaccuracy in the ILEE measurement is the swallow-induced air in the bolus. AIM: Compare a novel gel bolus to the current alternatives for the measurement of impedance-based luminal distension (cross-sectional area, CSA) during primary peristalsis. METHODS: 12 healthy subjects were studied using high-resolution impedance manometry (HRMZ) and concurrently performed intraluminal ultrasound (US) imaging of the esophagus. Three test bolus materials were used: 1) novel gel, 2) 0.5 N saline, and 3) commercially available Diversatek EFTV viscous. Testing was performed in the supine and Trendelenburg (-15°) positions. US imaging assessed air in the bolus and luminal CSA. The Nadir impedance values were correlated to the US measured CSA. A custom Matlab software was used to assess the bolus travel times and impedance-based luminal CSA. RESULTS: The novel gel bolus had the least amount of air in the bolus during its passage through the esophagus, as assessed by US image analysis. The novel gel bolus in the supine and Trendelenburg positions had the best linear fit between the US measured CSA and nadir impedance value (R2  = 0.88 & R2  = 0.90). The impedance-based calculation of the CSA correlated best with the US measured CSA with the use of the novel gel bolus. CONCLUSION: We suggest the use of novel gel to assess distension along with contraction during routine clinical HRM testing.

Relationship between distension-contraction waveforms during esophageal peristalsis: effect of bolus volume, viscosity, and posture.

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) in its current form assesses only the contraction phase of peristalsis. Degree of esophageal distension ahead of contraction is a surrogate of relaxation and can be measured from intraluminal esophageal impedance measurements. The characteristics of esophageal contractions, i.e., their amplitude, duration, velocity, and modulating factors, have been well studied. We studied the effect of bolus volume and viscosity and posture on swallow-induced distension and contraction and the temporal relationship between the two. HRM impedance recordings of 50 healthy subjects with no esophageal symptoms were analyzed. Eight to ten swallows of 5 and 10 mL of 0.5 N saline and a viscous bolus were recorded in the supine and Trendelenburg positions. Custom-built computer software generated the distension-contraction plots and numerical data of the amplitudes of distension (cross-sectional area) and contraction, and the temporal relationship between distension and peak contraction. The hallmarks of distension waveforms are that 1) distension peak, similarly to contraction, travels the esophagus in a peristaltic fashion, and the amplitude of distension increases from the proximal-to-distal direction; 2) the amplitude of distension is greater with 10 mL than with 5 mL and greater in Trendelenburg than in supine posture; and 3) bolus viscosity increases the amplitude of distension and alters the temporal relationship between distension and contraction waveforms. We describe the characteristics of esophageal distension during peristalsis and the relationship between distension and contraction in a relatively large cohort of normal subjects. These data can be used to compare differences between normal subjects and patients with various esophageal motility disorders in future studies.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We studied esophageal distension (surrogate of inhibition) ahead of contraction during peristalsis from intraluminal esophageal impedance measurements. Esophageal distension, similarly to contraction, travels the esophagus in a sequential manner, and the amplitude of esophageal distension increases from proximal to distal direction in the esophagus. Bolus volume, viscosity and posture have significant effects on the amplitude of distension and its temporal relationship with contraction.

Three-Dimensional Pressure Profile of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Crural Diaphragm in Patients with Achalasia Esophagus.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Smooth muscles of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and skeletal muscle of the crural diaphragm (esophagus hiatus) provide the sphincter mechanisms at the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). We investigated differences in the 3-dimensional (3D) pressure profile of the LES and hiatal contraction between healthy subjects and patients with achalasia esophagus. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 10 healthy subjects (controls; 7 male; mean age, 60 ± 15 years; mean body mass index, 25 ± 2) and 12 patients with a diagnosis of achalasia (7 male; mean age, 63 ± 13 years; mean body mass index, 26 ± 1), enrolled at a gastroenterology clinic. Participants underwent 3D high-resolution manometry (3DHRM) with a catheter equipped with 96 transducers (for the EGJ pressure recording). A 0.5-mm metal ball was taped close to the transducer number 1 of the 3DHRM catheter. EGJ pressure was recorded at end-expiration (LES pressure) and at the peak of forced inspiration (hiatal contraction). Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to localize the circumferential location of the metal ball on the catheter. Esophagus, LES, stomach, right and left crus of the diaphragm, and spine were segmented in each CT scan slice images to construct the 3D morphology of the region. RESULTS: The metal ball was located at the 7 o'clock position in all controls. The circumferential orientation of metal ball was displaced 45 to 90 degrees in patients with achalasia compared with controls. The 3D-pressure profile of the EGJ at end-expiration and forced inspiration revealed marked differences between the groups. The LES turns to the left as it entered from the chest into the abdomen, forming an angle between the spine and LES. The spine-LES angle was smaller in patients with achalasia (104°) compared with controls (124°). Five of the 10 subjects with achalasia had physical breaks in the left crus of the diaphragm CONCLUSIONS: Besides LES, the 3D pressure profile of the EGJ can indicate anatomic and functional abnormalities of the crural diaphragm muscle in patients with achalasia esophagus. Further studies are needed to define the nature of hiatal and crural diaphragm dysfunction in patients with achalasia of the esophagus.

Botox injection into the lower esophageal sphincter induces hiatal paralysis and gastroesophageal reflux.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic intrasphincteric injection of Botox (ISIB) is used routinely for the treatment of achalasia esophagus and other spastic motor disorders. Studies show that the ISIB reduces the smooth muscle lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. The esophageal hiatus, formed by the right crus of diaphragm, surrounds the cranial half of the LES and works like an external LES. We studied the effects of ISIB on the LES and hiatal contraction and gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Fourteen patients treated with ISIB were studied. Esophageal manometry-impedance recordings were performed before and after the ISIB. Hiatal contraction was assessed during tidal inspiration, forced inspiration, Müller's maneuver, and straight leg raise. In 6 subjects, the manometry were repeated 6-12 mo after the ISIB. The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure was measured at end expiration (LES pressure) and at the peak of maneuvers (hiatal contraction). Transdiaphragmatic pressure (pdi; force of diaphragmatic contraction) was measured at the peak of forced inspiration. GER was measured from the impedance recordings. The EGJ pressure at end expiration (LES pressure) decreased significantly after the Botox injection. The peak EGJ pressure at tidal inspiration, forced inspiration, Müller's maneuver, and straight leg raise was also dramatically reduced by the ISIB. There was no effect of Botox on the pdi during forced inspiration. Seven of 10 subjects demonstrated GER during maneuvers following the ISIB. Six to 12 mo after ISIB, the LES and hiatal contraction pressure returned to the pre-ISIB levels. ISIB, in addition to decreasing LES pressure, paralyzes the esophageal hiatus (crural diaphragm) and induces GER.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The sphincter mechanism at the lower end of the esophagus comprises smooth muscle lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and skeletal muscle crural diaphragm (hiatus). Current thinking is that the endoscopic intrasphincteric injection of Botox (ISIB), used routinely for the treatment of achalasia esophagus, reduces LES pressure. Our study shows that ISIB, even though injected into the LES, diffuses into the hiatus and causes its paralysis. These findings emphasize the importance of esophageal hiatus as an important component of the antireflux barrier and that the ISIB is refluxogenic.

Morphology of the Esophageal Hiatus: Is It Different in 3 Types of Hiatus Hernias?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The esophageal hiatus is formed by the right crus of the diaphragm in the majority of subjects. Contraction of the hiatus exerts a sphincter-like action on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The aim is to study the hiatal anatomy (using CT scan imaging) and function (using high-resolution manometry [HRM]), and esophageal motor function in patients with sliding and paraesophageal hiatal hernia. METHODS: We assessed normal subjects (n = 20), patients with sliding type 1 hernia (n = 18), paraesophageal type 2 hernia (n = 19), and mixed type 3 hernia (n = 19). Hernia diagnosis was confirmed on the upper gastrointestinal series. The hiatal morphology was constructed from the CT scan images. The LES pressure and relaxation, percent peristalsis, bolus pressure, and hiatal squeeze pressure were assessed by HRM. RESULTS: The CT images revealed that the esophageal hiatus is formed by the right crus of the diaphragm in all normal subjects and 86% of hernia patients. The hiatus is elliptical in shape with a surface area of 1037 mm2 in normal subjects. The hiatal dimensions were larger in patients compared to normal subjects. The HRM revealed impaired LES relaxation and higher bolus pressure in patients with paraesophageal compared to the sliding hernia. The hiatal pinch on HRM was recognized in significantly higher number of patients with sliding as compared to paraesophageal hernia. CONCLUSIONS: Using a novel approach, we provide details of the esophageal hiatus in patients with various kinds of hiatal hernia. Impaired LES relaxation in paraesophageal hernia may play a role in its pathophysiology and genesis of symptoms.

Loop analysis of the anal sphincter complex in fecal incontinent patients using functional luminal imaging probe.

Cardiac loops have been used extensively to study myocardial function. With changes in cardiac pump function, loops are shifted to the right or left. Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) recordings allow for loop analysis of the anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle (PRM) function. The goal was to characterize anal sphincter area-pressure/tension loop changes in fecal incontinence (FI) patients. Fourteen healthy subjects and 14 patients with FI were studied. A custom-designed FLIP was placed in the vagina and then in the anal canal, and deflated in 20-ml steps, from 90 to 30 ml. At each volume, subjects performed maximal voluntary squeezes. Area-pressure (AP) and area-tension (AT) loops were generated for each squeeze cycle. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter and PRM were obtained to determine the relationship between anal sphincter muscle damage and loop movements. With the increase in bag volume, AP loops and AT loops shifted to the right and upward in normal subjects (both anal and vaginal). The shift to the right was greater, and the upward movement was less in FI patients. The difference in the location of AP loops and AT loops was statistically significant at volumes of 50 ml to 90 ml (P < 0.05). A similar pattern was found in the vaginal loops. There is a significant relationship between the damage to the anal sphincter and PRM, and loop location of FI patients. We propose AP and AT loops as novel ways to assess the anal sphincter and PRM function. Such loops can be generated by real-time measurement of pressure and area within the anal canal.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We describe the use of area-pressure (AP) and area-tension (AT)-loop analysis of the anal sphincters and puborectalis muscles in normal subjects and fecal incontinent patients using the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP). There are differences in the magnitude of the displacement of the loops with increase in the FLIP bag volume between normal subjects and patients with fecal incontinence. The latter group shifts more to the right in AP and AT space.

Realistic forward and inverse model mesh generation for rapid three-dimensional thoracic electrical impedance imaging.

One of the most promising clinical applications of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is real-time monitoring of lung function in ambulatory or ICU due to the rapid, non-invasive and non-ionizing nature of the measurements. However, to move this modality into routine clinical use will, as a minimum, require the development of realistic and computationally efficient forward and inverse meshes of the thorax and the lungs alongside mechanisms to extract quantitative information from the resulting reconstructed images. The latter will allow for reduction of artefacts and better localization of conductivity changes within the image domain. This research aims to contribute towards this goal, by introducing a pipeline for the generation of anatomically accurate meshes for EIT forward and inverse models. We achieve this by the segmentation of realistic volumetric data from thoracic CT volumes, and subsequent tessellation. Mesh quality is assessed in terms of aspect ratio, dihedral and face angles. Moreover, the generated meshes are fused with currently available EIT software, with a novel electrode placement method, to show the practical application of the generated meshes. Results show that anatomically constrained unstructured meshes can be generated, conforming to realistic anatomical geometry, and performing well in EIT numerical computations. Such realistic computational models will further enhance the performance of EIT reconstruction algorithms, thus offering significant benefits to clinical EIT lung imaging.

High-frequency ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter muscles in normal subjects and patients with fecal incontinence.

INTRODUCTION: The current "gold standard" to diagnose anal sphincter morphology and disruptions utilizes low-frequency (3-9 MHz) ultrasound (US) imaging techniques that provide a general outline of the sphincter muscles, but not their microstructural details. High-frequency US transducers (7-15 MHz) have been used to study the muscle architecture (direction of muscle fascicles) in the limb muscle. AIMS: The goal of our study was to visualize the microstructural anatomy of the anal sphincters, specifically the external anal sphincter (EAS), using high-frequency US imaging. METHODS: Studies were conducted in asymptomatic female and male subjects and patients with fecal incontinence. US images were acquired using a low-frequency US (3-9 MHz) and high-frequency (7-15 MHz) US transducer. The latter was placed intra-anally to image the anal canal at 12, 9, 3, and 6 o'clock positions. RESULTS: The low-frequency US images revealed the general outline of the anal sphincter muscles. On the other hand, high-frequency imaging visualized muscle fascicles and connective tissue inside the external anal sphincter (EAS). In FI patients, there was loss of muscle fascicles and alteration in the echo-intensity pattern in the region of damaged EAS suggestive of muscle fibrosis. CONCLUSION: High-frequency ultrasound imaging is a powerful tool to visualize the microstructural details of the EAS. Our studies show that damage to the EAS muscle results in the alteration of its myoarchitecture, that is, loss of muscle fascicles and increase in the muscle connective tissue.

Topographical plots of esophageal distension and contraction: effects of posture on esophageal peristalsis and bolus transport.

Each swallow induces a wave of inhibition followed by contraction in the esophagus. Unlike contraction, which can easily be measured in humans using high-resolution manometry (HRM), inhibition is difficult to measure. Luminal distension is a surrogate of the esophageal inhibition. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of posture on the temporal and quantitative relationship between distension and contraction along the entire length of the esophagus in normal healthy subjects by using concurrent HRM, HRM impedance (HRMZ), and intraluminal ultrasound (US). Studies were conducted in 15 normal healthy subjects in the supine and Trendelenburg positions. Both manual and automated methods were used to extract quantitative pressure and impedance-derived features from the HRMZ recordings. Topographical plots of distension and contraction were visualized along the entire length of the esophagus. Distension was also measured from the US images during 10-ml swallows at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. Each swallow was associated with luminal distension followed by contraction, both of which traversed the esophagus in a sequential/peristaltic fashion. Luminal distension (US) and esophageal contraction amplitude were greater in the Trendelenburg compared with the supine position. Length of esophageal breaks (in the transition zone) were reduced in the Trendelenburg position. Change in posture altered the temporal relationship between distension and contraction, and bolus traveled closer to the esophageal contraction in the Trendelenburg position. Topographical contraction-distension plots derived from HRMZ recordings is a novel way to visualize esophageal peristalsis. Future studies should investigate if abnormalities of esophageal distension are the cause of functional dysphagia. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Ascending contraction and descending inhibition are two important components of peristalsis. High-resolution manometry only measures the contraction phase of peristalsis. We measured esophageal distension from intraluminal impedance recordings and developed novel contraction-distension topographical plots to prove that similar to contraction, distension also travels in a peristaltic fashion. Change in posture from the supine to the Trendelenburg position also increased the amplitude of esophageal distension and contraction and altered the temporal relationship between distension and contraction.